Cypress and Protractor are both end-to-end testing frameworks for web applications. However, there are some differences between the two:

• Architecture: Cypress is a newer framework that uses a different architecture than Protractor. It runs tests in the same environment as the application being tested, using a JavaScript engine in the browser, which allows it to provide fast and reliable tests. Protractor, on the other hand, uses WebDriver to control browsers, which can lead to slower tests and less reliable results.

• Syntax: Cypress and Protractor have different syntax and APIs for writing tests. Cypress uses a simple and easy-to-use API, while Protractor uses a more complex syntax that requires a higher level of programming knowledge.

• Speed: Cypress is generally faster than Protractor due to its architecture, which allows it to run tests faster and with fewer dependencies.

• Debugging: Cypress provides a built-in debugging tool that makes it easier to diagnose issues with tests, while Protractor requires more manual setup for debugging.

• Integration: Protractor integrates well with Angular applications, while Cypress can work with any web application regardless of the framework.

In summary, both Cypress and Protractor are effective testing frameworks, but Cypress is newer and generally faster and easier to use, while Protractor has better integration with Angular applications.